[Sdnp] updated SDN problem statement draft
anton.ivanov at kot-begemot.co.uk
Tue Mar 13 10:35:18 EDT 2012
On 13/03/12 13:58, Thomas Nadeau wrote:
> Please review and send us comments/feedback.
> SDNP mailing list
> SDNP at lucidvision.com
Page 5 - migrate, not "mirage" in 3rd paragraph. A few other language
niggles on that page as well. I will try to get around to send a proper
edit set later this week.
Page 9, paragraph 7. "may", not will. It will if it needs to. If it can
re-route cleanly, why should it bother telling that to applications?
Suggested improvement to use cases - they will look "leaner", "cleaner"
and cause fewer arguments if they start with an intro which maps out the
semantics - what is the Application (in the SDN sense) in each
particular case, who talks to the controller, who arbitrates, etc.
More information about the SDNP